Monday, December 3, 2012

Blog #6





In this blog am required to do a research and summarized some information on The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Zeitoun!

            The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is a federal law that allows the President to indefinitely detain American citizens suspected of being a threat to the nation. The bill was passed by the US House in December 14 and the US Senate on December 15, 2011. The NDAA also allows the President authority to use the Military Force against terrorism (AUMF). Although the President’s statement maintain that under his “administration he will not allow the indefinite military detention without a trial”. In other words, while the Presidential term is running he will not allow any of this to happen. On the other hand, when Obama’s administration get to the end what will happen with this law and how stable or lasting can it be. I think that the next President can always fix this to it convenience. However, there are oppose part who are fighting against the NDAA like the American Civil Liberties Union (UCLU) whose preserve and defend individual’s rights and also Americans in the United States. They believe this law is against human rights and they are voicing out their opposing along with many others who refused the act. In the book of Zeitoun by Dave Eggers, I can see a perfect example of the injustice that was made with Zeitoun when he stayed in New Orleans protecting his business. He was captive and taken away to a place where he didn’t know and tortured without having any possible right of not even a phone call or a lawyer, all because he was suspected of being a terrorist. This was unfair, though he was not supposed to be in the city he was helping people who stayed behind and without his help who knew what would have happened to those people. However, it’s true that terrorism is a worrying issue for the United States and its people, but everyone deserves the right of a lawyer even if accused of terrorism. Without defense than how would the person prove its innocence?